Skip to content
Storymoderate

Rosaria Butterfield and the Hospitality of Truth

Rosaria Butterfield's testimony can show patient hospitality and Scripture at work, but sexuality-related material must be used without exploitation.

Rosaria Butterfield20th-21st centuryUnited States4 min read

Listen to this story

~4 min read-aloud

In the world of American universities there was a woman trained to take Christianity apart. Her name is Rosaria Butterfield, and in the 1990s she was a tenured professor at Syracuse University, an expert in feminist and queer theory, respected, settled, and certain. She lived with her partner. She wrote and taught against the very faith she would one day defend. And to her mind, the people most in need of critique were the Christians who kept knocking at the culture's door with answers nobody had asked for. So when she wrote a newspaper article taking aim at the religious right, she expected the usual hate mail. Some of it came. But one letter did not fit the pattern.

The letter was from a pastor named Ken Smith. It was kind. It was curious. It did not condemn her, and it did not flatter her. It simply asked questions, real ones, the kind that refuse easy filing. How did she come to her beliefs? What did she think truth was? She could not decide which pile to put it in, the friendly mail or the hate mail, so she did something a scholar does. She kept it. And then she telephoned.

What followed was not a campaign. It was a table. Ken Smith and his wife Floy invited her into their home, and they fed her, and they listened. They did not treat her as a project to be fixed. They did not rush her or perform their patience. They simply kept the door open, kept the meals coming, kept the conversation turning, gently and without retreat, back to the words of Scripture and the shape of an ordinary life. Months passed. She began, on her own, to read the Bible. By her account she read it many times over, not as a believer hunting for comfort, but as a critic searching for the seams. The seams did not give way. The words began to read her instead.

This was no lightning strike on a public stage. It was slow, and it cost her nearly everything she had built. Her conversion meant the unravelling of a life, the loss of a community that had been her home, the surrender of certainties she had taught for years. She has called it, in her own telling, a train wreck. There was grief in it. There was no triumph parade. There was a woman at a kitchen table, week after week, weighing whether truth was worth the ruin of all she had known. And she came, at last, to Christ. Not to a debate won, not to an argument cornered, but to a person, and a table, and a Word that would not let her go.

What her story came to mean was something both halves of the church needed to hear. To those who had truth without warmth, it said that orthodoxy left on a doorstep convinces no one. To those who had warmth without truth, it said that real welcome does not pretend the Word is optional. The Smiths gave her both, and refused to separate them. They never controlled the timeline of God's work in her. They set a place and let grace do the slow thing it does. Rosaria Butterfield went on to write of it, and to spend her life arguing that hospitality is not soft sentiment but holy ground, the place where strangers are fed and truth is told in the same breath. Her testimony is not a weapon to be aimed at anyone. It is a window. And through it you can still see that table, the plates set, the candle lit, the door held open for a woman who came to argue and stayed to be loved into the truth.

Scripture Connections

NT

Paul's call to practise hospitality frames the Smiths' open table as Christian obedience.

NT

Welcoming the stranger as if entertaining angels mirrors the patient welcome Rosaria received.

NT

The living and active Word that reads the reader matches her account of Scripture searching her.

Themes

ConversionHospitalityScripture & the WordTestimonyTruth & TruthfulnessApologetics

Lesson Points

  • 1Hospitality can carry truth patiently.
  • 2Do not exploit sexuality testimonies.
  • 3Conversion stories belong to Christ, not to culture-war use.

Debrief Questions

1.Who would feel safe enough to be honest at our table?

2.How do we speak truth without treating people as projects?

3.Where might curiosity become exploitation?

Where to Use

Teaching hospitality and evangelismDiscussing conversion with sensitivityTraining churches to welcome seekersPreaching on Scripture's patient work

Sensitivity note

Use non-exploitative language and avoid weaponizing the testimony against LGBTQ listeners or neighbors.

Fact-check notes

Well attested via Butterfield's own memoir The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert, her Crossway author profile, and Christianity Today: she was a tenured Syracuse professor in feminist and queer theory, wrote a critical newspaper article, received a kind letter from Pastor Ken Smith, and was drawn to faith over time through the Smiths' hospitality and repeated Bible reading. The 'train wreck' description and the framing of conversion as costly loss are her own words. I have not invented dialogue; the questions in Ken Smith's letter are paraphrased from her published account and should be verified against her writing before quotation. Speak with care given this is a living public figure and sexuality testimonies are easily exploited.

Category

Science, Medicine & Apologetics

Era

1962-present; conversion story public from 2010s

Words

625

Region

United States